The Left Must Fight For A Real Brexit

Former Syriza MP  Costas Lapavitsas  on the left-wing case against the EU

”After the outbreak of the Eurozone crisis, in the first few years, there was all kind of talk across Europe about reform in a left-wing direction: favouring working people, no more austerity, pro-growth measures, income redistribution and more democracy. But we have seen the precise opposite. The EU has become more rigid and less democratic.

It is now up to the left to tell people that it is perfectly possible to leave without a deal and that we should not be scared of it

After we leave, we will recapture a lot of powers from the EU which can be used to transform our economy. With those powers, we should propose an economic programme that would rebalance the economy towards industry, away from the services sector and, in particular, the bloated financial-services sector. That should go alongside turning key resources into public property, like trains, energy and water, and investment in infrastructure. And we need to start redistributing wealth – Britain’s inequality is at ridiculous levels for an advanced country.

This is what the left should propose to the British people – much of which would be impossible to do in the EU.”

Full Interview :


Bad News for the 99%

The pursuit of economic – or more accurately capital – ”growth” at all costs has reached a critical point.

As William I. Robinson explains in his book ‘‘Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Humanity’‘, the world financial system has now centralised and over-accumulated capital to such a point that investment opportunities have become limited.

Professor Robinson argues that only three mechanisms for investing excess capital remain : risky financial speculation, wars and war-preparation, and the privatisation of public institutions.

Not a pleasant outlook for the 99%, who are forced to bail out bad bets through austerity, pay for (and die in) endless wars, and suffer the consequences of the dismemberment of public services by complicit governments.

Neo-Liberalism and The Family


When neoliberal economists, either from ignorance or intentional deception, eulogise ”full employment”, they ignore the obvious fact that lower labour-force participation rates in previous decades reflect a time when most married women were at home, not in the work-force. In those halcyon days, one earner was all it took to sustain a family.

But the capitalist class was not content to exploit just one member of each family. They wanted more, so by using economic policy to suppress wages while fomenting inflation, and later making cynical use of the so-called ”feminist” movement, they drove married women into work and wage-slavery, imposing huge external costs on the family, on child-raising, on relations between spouses, and on the children themselves. The divorce rate exploded to nearly 50 percent and single-parent households became almost the norm.

In effect, unleashed late-stage capitalism destroyed not only the economy and the environment, but also the family.

Image : Adrienne (Woman with Bangs) ~ Amedeo Modigliani, 1917

Top Secret : Deep State War Crimes Cover-Up in Rwanda

Featured Image -- 8690Article by Christopher Black,  an international criminal lawyer based in Toronto. He is known for a number of high-profile war crimes cases and writes essays on international law, politics and world events for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”

The United States and its allies are experts at covering their crimes and finding scapegoats to take the blame for them. They are doing it now with their disinformation campaigns against Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, and Syria. The show trials at the UN’s Yugoslav tribunal, the ICTY, were all about covering-up NATO’s war crimes and spinning lies to blame everything on the Serbs who resisted NATO’s aggression.

They use their influence at the International Criminal Court for the same purposes. And now a document has come to light, leaked from the UN’s Rwanda war crimes tribunal, the ICTR, that contains a report on the war crimes of the US supported Rwanda Patriotic Front that invaded Rwanda from Uganda in 1990, conducted four years of terrorist operations against the Rwanda people and government, then in 1994 launched their final offensive and slaughtered their way to power. To discuss this document, marked “Top Secret” I have to burden the reader with a brief history of events from the evidence available in order to give it some context.

The night of April 6, 1994 the Hutu presidents of Rwanda and Burundi, Juvenal Habyarimana and Cyprien Ntaryamira, and General Nsabimana, the Rwandan Army Chief of Staff, as well as several other dignitaries and a French flight crew were murdered when the plane they were on was shot down over Kigali airport by anti-aircraft missiles fired by members of the Tutsi-led Rwanda Patriotic Front, or RPF, with the assistance of the governments of several countries. Paul Kagame, the leader of the RPF junta now in control of Rwanda, and who was seen with US Army soldiers at his headquarters two days before the event, gave the final order for the shoot down but he did so with the assistance or complicity of the governments of the United States of America, Britain, Belgium, Canada, and Uganda. It was the United States and its allies, hoping to gain total control of the resources of Central Africa through their proxies in the Tutsi RPF, that provided the military support for the RPF invasion of Rwanda from Uganda beginning in 1990, flowing that support through Uganda.

It is known that the missiles used to shoot down the aircraft came from stockpiles the Americans had seized in their first war against Iraq, passed to Uganda, and it was in a warehouse at Kigali airport, rented by a CIA Swiss front company, that the missiles were assembled. In fact, the French anti-terrorist judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere, who spent several years investigating the shoot down on behalf of the families of the French flight-crew, told Boutros-Boutros Ghali, the Secretary-General of the UN in 1994, that the CIA was involved in the shoot down, adding strength to Boutros-Ghali’s statement to a Canadian journalist that the Americans are 100% responsible for what happened in Rwanda.

There is strong direct and circumstantial evidence that the Belgian and Canadian contingents of the UN peacekeeping force in Rwanda in 1993-94, known as UNAMIR, were also involved in the shoot down and assisted the RPF in their final offensive that was launched with the decapitation strike on the plane. It was the Canadian General Romeo Dallaire, Force Commander of UNAMIR, who arranged for one axis of the runway at the airport to be closed at the request of the RPF, making it easier to shoot down the plane as it tried to land.

Dallaire consistently sided with the RPF during his mandate, gave continuous military intelligence to the RPF about government army positions, took his orders from the American and Belgian ambassadors and another Canadian general, Maurice Baril, in the Department of Peace-Keeping Operations in New York, then headed by Kofi Annan, lied to his boss, Jacques Roger Booh-Booh, about his knowledge of a build-up for a final Ugandan Army-RPF offensive, and turned a blind eye to the infiltration into Kigali of possibly 13,000 RPF combatants when they were permitted only 600 under the Arusha Peace Accords signed in October 1993. It was another Canadian, General Guy Tousignant, who took over from Dallaire after the RPF took power when UNAMIR II helped the RPF consolidate the rewards of its aggression.

Burundi was involved both by permitting 600 US Army Rangers to be situated in Burundi in case they were needed by the RPF and by invading Rwanda from the south in May, 1994 to link up with the RPF forces. Tanzania was involved in both the planning of the shoot down and, itself invaded Rwanda from the east and south blocking escape routes for the Hutu refugees fleeing the atrocities of the RPF in their sweep towards Kigali.

Finally, evidence indicates that Belgian UN soldiers were in the immediate area of the missile launch site at the time of the shoot down and were also involved.

The report into the shoot down of the plane by the French investigative judge Jean-Louis Bruguière was leaked to the French newspaper Le Monde in 2004 and states that the RPF was responsible with the help of the CIA. But before the French judge began his investigation The Chief Prosecutor for the Rwanda tribunal, Canadian judge Louise Arbour, the same woman that framed up President Milosevic on behalf of the USA at the Yugoslav tribunal, was told in 1997 by her lead investigator, Australian lawyer Michael Hourigan, that it was the RPF commando group known as the “Network”, with the assistance of a foreign power, implicating the CIA, that was responsible for the shoot down.

At that point Arbour, instead of prosecuting everyone involved, as she should have done, on American instruction, ordered the investigation closed and kept secret thereby making her an accessory to a war crime. The facts relating to Arbour’s action is detailed in Michael Hourigan’s affidavit, still available on the internet and his report to the Office of Internal Oversight of the UN.

During the war crimes trials at the Rwanda tribunal defence lawyers, representing the only group targeted for prosecution, the side that tried to resist aggression, members of the Rwandan government, its armed forces and officials as well as Hutu intellectuals, demanded full disclosure of all the evidence the prosecution had relevant to what happened in the war and the allegations of war crimes made against our clients. In the trial of my client, General Ndindilyimana, Chief of Staff of the Gendarmerie, who after a long struggle was finally acquitted, made repeated requests for disclosure of that evidence but we never received the complete disclosure we demanded because over time we became aware that the prosecution had much more material than they were willing to show us.

One famous example of this is the Gersony Report made by Robert Gersony, a USAID, official seconded to the UN, who filed a report to the High Commissioner For Refugees in October 1994 setting out his findings that the RPF forces engaged in the systematic massacres of Hutus across Rwanda during their offensive, which he characterized as genocide. This report too was kept secret by the UNHCR and by the prosecution lawyers in our trial who even denied that it existed. But in 2008 my team found it by chance, and in the prosecution files, and I was able to produce it into evidence in the trial, along with a letter from Paul Kagame dated August of 1994 in which he refers to a meeting with Ugandan president Museveni in which the “plan for Zaire” was discussed. Those two agreed that the Hutus were in the way of the “plan” but Kagame stated that they were working with the Belgian, American and British intelligence services to execute the “plan” and the problem would be solved, The world has since seen what this ‘plan” involved; the invasions of Zaire, the extermination of hundreds of thousands of Hutu refugees, the killings of millions of Congolese in the wars that followed, as detailed in the leaked UN Mapping Report of 2010, and the shattering of Congo into fragments to be easily exploited by western mining companies.

Yet, little did we know as our trial proceeded that the prosecution had in their hands another document, an internal report dated October 1, 2003 in which their own investigators list and describe in 31 pages the crimes of the RPF forces they had investigated. This report, designated Top Secret, has recently been leaked and a copy was sent to me, among others, to examine and it is as damning of the RPF, and therefore their western allies, as the others.

The document, with the subject reference “General Report on the Special Investigations concerning the crimes committed by the Rwanda Patriotic Army (RPA) during 1994’ was sent to the then Prosecutor Hassan Jallow by three members of the Prosecution Special Investigations Unit. It provides to the Prosecutor the evidence they had gathered that the RPA had committed massacres of thousands of Hutus in various places across Rwanda, for example, Byumba, Kabgayi, Rambara, Gitarama, and Butare, as well as the murder of three Catholic bishops and nine other priests at a church. The circumstances set out in the report confirm Gersony’s Report of similar massacres and also confirms witness testimony we heard during the trials that the RPA forces had infiltrated men into civilian barricades to kill people in order to pin the crimes on the Rwandan government forces and the youth group known as the interahamwe.

Finally they provide, once again, further evidence that the RPA did shoot down the presidential plane, confirming the findings of Michael Hourigan in 1997 detailed above and which Louise Arbour had ordered kept secret, confirming the findings of the French report and confirming the evidence we filed at trial to the same effect, including a radio intercept from Kagame to his forces, the day after the plane was hit, celebrating the downing of the plane as a successful operation. It is a very important and damning report. Kept secret. One wonders how many more secret reports they have.

There is not space here to detail the horrific crimes set out in the document, or to relate to you the evidence we heard at the trials-what one Hutu refugee, speaking of the hunting down of Hutu refugees in the Congo by the RPF forces, assisted by spotter planes with US Air Force markings, called the “genocide with no name,” so I provide just a few examples from this document to give readers the picture. On page 28, in reference to the capital city of Rwanda, Kigali, it states:

“Camp Kanombe (a government military base) at the end of May 1994. When the RPA captured Kanombe, approximately 1500 civilians had taken refuge in the camp. They were all massacred by the RPA.’

‘Kanombe Airport, at the end of May 1994, approximately 200 to 300 civilians of all ages were brought …and executed.”

“Masaka, Kanombe commune, end of July 1994, – in 5 days approximately 6,000 women children and men were executed with their arms tied behind their back at the elbow.

“Camp Kami, during the capture of the camp by the RPA thousands of civilians who had taken refuge there were executed”

The picture is clear. Yet, to this date not a single member of the RPF or their western allies has been charged for their responsibility for these crimes and Paul Kagame, who ordered these killings, is hosted with smiles by leaders from Canada to France to China. The prosecutors who decided to protect these war criminals, and who, by withholding evidence of what really happened, obstructed justice, conspired to frame up those standing accused before the tribunal, turned international justice into a travesty, and gave these criminals immunity from prosecution and encouragement to commit more crimes have moved on to lucrative positions. Fatima Bensouda, one of those former ICTR prosecutors, is now the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.

Where is the justice for the 6,000 men, women and children murdered at Masaka? Where is the hue and cry for the head of Paul Kagame as there was for the head of President Milosevic and the allegations he faced or as President Assad of Syria faces? Where is the hue and cry for the head of General Dallaire, or for Louise Arbour, who condoned these crimes, as there was for General Mladic regarding the allegations about Srebrenica? There is none. Instead they are made celebrities, for we live a world in which criminals have seized hold of morality and justice and hanged them from a tree.


‘The Layabout Lady of Mayfair’

”A pointless peer, and a ludicrous waste of public money.”

This bimbo – a resident of the Isle of Man – is taking the p*ss bigtime.

She is living disproof, if it was needed, of any ”credibility” the UK House of Lords might claim to have. 😂mone

Baroness Mone urged to resign after missing 88% of days in Lords

The Conservative peer Baroness Mone has been dubbed the “Layabout Lady of Mayfair” after her attendance record was disclosed by the House of Lords.

The Glaswegian businesswoman was facing calls to resign after it was revealed that her absence rate was 88 per cent. She turned up on 19 days out of a possible 157 in a parliamentary year and missed debates on important issues, including a key vote on Britain’s withdrawal from Europe.

Rona Mackay, the SNP MSP, said: “Michelle Mone is the ultimate poster girl for the abolition of the Lords and is increasingly an embarrassment to the Scottish Tories and Ruth Davidson. While Westminster politics faces the chaos and financial ruin of Brexit, one of its toughest challenges for generations, she’s been missing in action.

“Lady Mone is a pointless peer, and a ludicrous waste of public money. Little wonder there are fresh calls for the Layabout Lady of Mayfair to resign. Better still, we should abolish the Lords altogether and chuck all the has-beens, failed politicians, aristocrats and party cronies off the public payroll.”

After Lady Mone was ennobled by the prime minister David Cameron in 2015, Douglas Anderson, the joint managing director of the Glasgow-based GAP Group, which has a turnover of £150 million a year, wrote to him to complain.

Of her attendance record, he said: “She could always resign. You would need to look at how often other peers turn up, but if she was at the bottom of that league table then she should stand down. I can’t see her doing it, though, as she clearly loves the title too much.

“She does not understand the meaning of the words ‘duty’ and ‘responsibility’. This is an abominable attendance record.”

Lady Mone, who founded the Ultimo lingerie brand and now has her own jewellery range, told peers in her maiden speech: “I look forward to playing a full and active role in your lordships’ house.”

Figures released by the Lords show that in July this year and December last year, Lady Mone, 47, did not turn up once. She did not attend a Lords’ debate on the role of women in public life as part of the commemorations for some women gaining the right to vote 100 years ago, nor on June 20 when both houses were debating the EU withdrawal bill. Three days earlier she had posted pictures of her relaxing in Monaco on social media.

A peer ceases to be a member under section 2 of the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 if they do not attend a sitting of the House during a session lasting six months or more. At one stage in the previous 2016-17 session of parliament, Lady Mone was present on only seven out of a possible 86 working days.

A spokesman for Lady Mone said: “Baroness Mone is proud to be part of the House of Lords. She is also a full-time businesswoman and a fully-committed mum. This year she has launched a global business as well as overseeing her other companies but will always take her duties in the House of Lords very seriously.”

Girl got ”form” …



‘Nothing was illegal’: British lingerie tycoon defends boyfriend over alleged link to tax avoidance

Baroness Bra Michelle Mone accused of bullying and sex bias at work

Girl likes MONE(Y) …


Keynes on Capitalism


John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) was the most influential economist of the 20th century, until the extreme neoliberalism espoused by Friedrich Hayek, Milton FrIedman and the so-called ‘Chicago School’ was adopted by the likes of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher in the late 1970s – and morality was henceforth removed from the sacrosanct workings of ”the market”.

Keynes also said, with tragic foresight and little exaggeration : ”The avoidance of taxes is the only intellectual pursuit that still carries any reward.”

Trickle-Down ?

trickledown explained in detail

Trickle-down economics, explained in detail.

The Oxfam Davos Report, studiously ignored by mass media, shows that 62 individuals – (it was 388 in 2010) – now own more wealth than 50% of the world’s population combined. More shockingly it reports, from uncontested public sources, that the share of wealth of half of the world’s people has collapsed by over 40% in the last five years.

The assertion that ‘’the poor are being lifted out of poverty in ever greater numbers’’ is still repeated despite the hard evidence that, in fact, the poorer half of humanity has lost almost half of their wealth in just the last five years.

What does it mean for the “trickle-down” theory when, in truth, the trickle goes UP in hundreds of billions to the rich from the already poor and destitute ?

What can we say now of the endlessly proclaimed doctrine that the global market brings “more wealth for all” when, in fact, unimpeachable business evidence shows that the opposite is the reality on the ground and across the world ?…/how-the-rich-eat-the-poor-and-the…/